top of page

Dissolution of Partnership in India


Dissolution of Partnership

Blog Content:


The dissolution of a partnership firm signifies the end of the legal relationship between all partners involved in the business. This process is governed by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, which provides a detailed framework for the dissolution, its modes, consequences, and the settlement of accounts.


This article aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the dissolution of partnership firms in India, covering all essential aspects and legal provisions, along with relevant case laws.


Meaning of Dissolution of a Partnership Firm

As stipulated under Section 39 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, the dissolution of a partnership firm means the discontinuance of the legal relationship between all the partners of the firm.


This implies a complete severance of the legal ties that bind the partners, leading to the termination of the firm.


Distinction Between Dissolution and Reconstitution

There is a clear distinction between the dissolution and reconstitution of a partnership firm. Reconstitution occurs when there is a change in the composition of the firm due to the retirement, death, or insolvency of a partner.


In such cases, the firm continues to exist but with a new set of partners, forming a reconstituted firm. However, dissolution implies a complete severance of the legal relationship between all partners, leading to the termination of the firm.


Examples of Reconstitution

  1. Retirement or Death of a Partner: If John, Johnson, and Joseph are partners in a firm, and John retires or dies, the firm can continue with Johnson and Joseph as a reconstituted firm, provided the partnership deed allows for such continuity.

  2. Admission of a New Partner: If Jagdish is admitted as a new partner in the firm of John, Johnson, and Joseph, the firm is reconstituted with a new partnership agreement.


Modes of Dissolution of a Partnership Firm

A partnership firm can be dissolved in several ways, as outlined below:


1. By Mutual Agreement

Under Section 40, a partnership firm can be dissolved at any time with the mutual consent of all partners, in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement.


2. By Notice of Dissolution

As per Section 43, a partnership-at-will can be dissolved by any partner giving notice in writing to the other partners, expressing the intention to dissolve the firm.


The dissolution takes effect from the date mentioned in the notice or, if no date is specified, from the date of communication of the notice.


The case of Banarsi Das vs Kanshi Ram, AIR (1963) S.C. 1165 clarified that the filing of a suit for dissolution is not considered a notice under Section 43; the effective date of dissolution is the date of the preliminary decree by the court.


3. By Operation of Law

Section 41 provides for the compulsory dissolution of a partnership firm by operation of law under the following circumstances:

  • If all partners, or all but one, are adjudicated as insolvent.

  • If an event occurs that makes the business or the firm's existence unlawful.

4. By the Happening of Certain Contingencies

According to Section 42, a partnership firm is dissolved upon the occurrence of specific events unless otherwise agreed by the partners:

  • Expiry of the term for which the firm was constituted.

  • Completion of the specific project for which the firm was formed.

  • Death of a partner.

  • Insolvency of a partner.

5. By a Decree of the Court

Section 44 allows for the dissolution of a partnership firm by a court order under various circumstances, such as:

  • Insanity or permanent incapacity of a partner.

  • Misconduct by a partner affecting the business.

  • Persistent breach of the partnership agreement by a partner.

  • Transfer of a partner's entire interest in the firm to a third party.

  • The business can only be carried on at a loss.

  • Any other just and equitable ground.

Case Laws on Grounds for Dissolution

Misconduct by a Partner

  • Pearce vs Foster, 17 B.D.536: The act of a partner making speculations on the price of cotton was considered misconduct justifying the dissolution of the partnership firm.

  • Carmichael vs Evans, 1940, 1 Ch. 486: A partner's conviction for traveling in a railway compartment without a ticket with the intention of fraud was considered misconduct leading to the dissolution of the solicitors' firm.

  • Essel vs Hayward, 30, Beav. 158: A partner's conviction for an offense involving moral turpitude was considered grounds for dissolving the partnership firm.

Transfer of Interest

  • Cassels vs Stewart, 6 App. Cas. 64: This case established that a partner can transfer their entire share in the partnership to a co-partner, as it does not involve the admission of a new partner.

Loss-Making Firm

  • Rahmatun-nisa vs Price, 42 Bom. 380: The court dissolved a partnership firm established for a fixed period because its business could only be carried on at a loss.

Consequences of Dissolution

The dissolution of a partnership firm has several consequences, including the winding up of the firm's affairs, realization of assets, payment of liabilities, and distribution of the surplus among partners.

Rights of Partners

Under Section 46, after dissolution, any partner or their representative has the right to:

  • Have the firm's property applied in the payment of debts.

  • Have the surplus distributed among the partners or their representatives according to their rights.

Binding the Firm

After dissolution, a partner cannot bind the firm except for actions necessary to wind up the firm's affairs or complete unfinished transactions.

Sharing of Profits

As per Section 50, any profit earned by a partner from transactions related to the firm after its dissolution must be shared with the other partners.

Return of Premium on Premature Dissolution

Section 51 stipulates that if a partner paid a premium upon joining the firm for a fixed term and the firm is dissolved before the term expires, the partner is entitled to a refund of the premium or a reasonable part of it, except in cases where:

  • The dissolution is due to the partner's misconduct.

  • The dissolution is caused by the death of a partner.

  • The partnership agreement does not provide for a refund.

Restraint of Trade by the Buyer of Goodwill

Section 54 allows partners to enter into an agreement with the buyer of the firm's goodwill, restricting them from carrying on a similar business within specified limits. Such restrictions must be reasonable to be enforceable.

Settlement of Accounts

If the partnership deed does not specify how accounts should be settled, Section 48 provides the following order for settling accounts:

  1. Payment of debts to outsiders.

  2. Payment to partners for advances made to the firm.

  3. Payment to partners for capital contributions.

  4. Distribution of the remaining balance among partners according to their profit-sharing ratio.

Rule in Garner vs Murray

The rule in Garner vs Murray (1904, 1 chapter 57) states that if a partner is insolvent or unable to contribute their share, the remaining solvent partners must share the available assets in proportion to their original capital contributions.

Limitation Period

The limitation period for filing a case regarding the settlement of accounts after dissolution is three years.

Payment of Partnership Debt

Section 49 states that the firm's property should first be used to pay the firm's debts. Any surplus is then used to pay the partners' separate debts or distributed to them.

Sale of Goodwill after Dissolution

Section 55 provides that the goodwill of the firm should be included in the assets and may be sold separately or with other assets. After the sale, a partner may compete with the buyer but cannot use the firm's name, represent themselves as carrying on the firm's business, or solicit the firm's customers.



The dissolution of a partnership firm in India is a well-defined process governed by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. Understanding the various modes of dissolution, the consequences, and the legal provisions for settling accounts is crucial for partners to navigate this process smoothly.


By adhering to the legal framework, partners can ensure a fair and orderly dissolution of the firm, protecting their rights and interests.


The case laws discussed provide valuable insights into how courts interpret and apply these provisions, offering guidance for partners facing similar situations.

78 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comentários


bottom of page