top of page

International Environmental law and Stockholm Conference

The Stockholm Conference, formally known as the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, held in 1972, was a important event in the development of international environmental law.


Stockholm Conference and International Environment law

Blog Content:


It laid the groundwork for many of the principles that continue to guide environmental governance today. Here are the major principles of international environmental law, discussed in the context of the Stockholm Conference:


Major Principles

The major principles of international environmental law established at the 1972 Stockholm Conference are:

  1. The No-Harm Principle: Principle 21 states that "States have...the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction." This enshrines the customary international law principle of preventing transboundary environmental harm.

  2. The Prevention Principle: Principle 6 calls upon States to "stop and reverse the adverse effects of the activities of man in many regions of the earth." This establishes the duty of prevention, requiring States to take proactive measures to prevent environmental degradation.

  3. The Precautionary Principle: Principle 15 states that "lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation." This codifies the precautionary approach, allowing preventive action in the face of scientific uncertainty.

  4. The Polluter Pays Principle: Principle 22 provides that "States shall cooperate to develop further the international law regarding liability and compensation for the victims of pollution and other environmental damage." This lays the foundation for making polluters bear the costs of environmental harm.

  5. The Principle of Public Participation: Principle 19 calls for dissemination of information and public participation in environmental decision-making processes. This establishes the importance of transparency and stakeholder involvement.

  6. The Principle of International Cooperation: Principles 24 and 25 emphasize the need for international cooperation to protect and improve the environment through multilateral or bilateral arrangements.

These principles, while not legally binding, have been highly influential in shaping subsequent international environmental law treaties, national legislation, and jurisprudence.


Shaping International Env law

The 1972 Stockholm Conference laid the groundwork for several major international environmental agreements that followed. Some key examples influenced by the principles established at Stockholm include:

  1. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in 1973, which regulates global trade in endangered species of plants and animals. This reflects the principles of international cooperation and prevention enshrined at Stockholm.

  2. The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer in 1985 and its Montreal Protocol in 1987, which phased out ozone-depleting substances. These were guided by the precautionary principle from Stockholm.

  3. The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992, its Kyoto Protocol in 1997, and the Paris Agreement in 2015, addressing greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. The UNFCCC was directly inspired by the Stockholm Declaration's call for international cooperation on environmental issues.

  4. The Convention on Biological Diversity in 1992, aimed at conserving biodiversity and promoting sustainable use of its components. This aligns with the prevention and precautionary principles advocated at Stockholm.

  5. The Basel Convention in 1989, regulating the transboundary movement of hazardous wastes. It reflects the no-harm and polluter pays principles from Stockholm.

While not legally binding, the Stockholm Declaration's foundational principles have significantly shaped the development of international environmental law through these and other multilateral agreements in the decades since


Major Impact of Stockholm Conference

The Stockholm Conference, marked the first major international gathering focused solely on environmental issues and laid the foundation for the modern framework of international environmental governance.


1. Highlighting Environmental Issues

The Stockholm Conference brought global attention to the environmental challenges facing the planet.


It highlighted issues such as pollution, deforestation, and the depletion of natural resources, emphasizing the need for a coordinated international response. Impact:

  • Elevated environmental issues to the forefront of international policy discussions.

  • Fostered a global consciousness about the interconnectedness of environmental problems.

2. Establishing Fundamental Principles

The conference produced the Stockholm Declaration, which outlined 26 principles that have since become foundational to international environmental law. These principles include the right to a healthy environment, the responsibility of states to prevent environmental harm, and the importance of sustainable development. Impact:

  • Provided a normative framework for subsequent international environmental agreements.

  • Influenced national environmental policies and legislation.

3. Creation of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)

One of the most significant outcomes of the Stockholm Conference was the establishment of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). UNEP was created to coordinate global environmental efforts, provide leadership, and encourage sustainable development through sound environmental practices. Impact:

  • UNEP has played a crucial role in facilitating international cooperation on environmental issues.

  • It has been instrumental in the development and implementation of numerous environmental treaties and protocols.

4. Promoting International Cooperation

The conference underscored the necessity of international cooperation to address environmental challenges that transcend national borders. It encouraged states to work together in a spirit of partnership to protect the global environment. Impact:

  • Led to the creation of numerous multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs).

  • Fostered collaboration between developed and developing countries on environmental issues.

5. Integrating Environment and Development

The Stockholm Conference was one of the first international forums to link environmental protection with economic development. It recognized that environmental degradation and poverty are interconnected and that sustainable development is essential for long-term environmental health. Impact:

  • Laid the groundwork for the concept of sustainable development, which was later elaborated in the Brundtland Report (1987) and the Rio Earth Summit (1992).

  • Influenced the integration of environmental considerations into development planning and policy.

6. Encouraging National Environmental Policies

The principles and recommendations from the Stockholm Conference encouraged countries to develop and implement their own environmental policies and legislation. Many nations established environmental ministries or agencies and enacted laws to address pollution, conservation, and resource management. Impact:

  • Strengthened national environmental governance frameworks.

  • Promoted the adoption of environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and other regulatory tools.

7. Fostering Public Participation

The conference emphasized the importance of public awareness and participation in environmental decision-making. It recognized that informed and engaged citizens are crucial for effective environmental governance.Impact:

  • Encouraged the dissemination of environmental information and education.

  • Empowered non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society to play a more active role in environmental advocacy and policy-making.


 

Principle in Stockholm Conference

1. Principle of Sovereignty and Responsibility: Principle 21

This principle asserts that states have the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental policies. However, it also emphasizes that states have the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other states or areas beyond national jurisdiction. Implications:

  • Balances national sovereignty with international responsibility.

  • Encourages states to consider the transboundary impacts of their environmental policies.

2. Principle of Sustainable Development: Principle 2

The concept of sustainable development, although more fully articulated in later documents like the Brundtland Report (1987), has its roots in the Stockholm Conference. It emphasizes the need to balance economic development with environmental protection to ensure that the needs of present and future generations are met. Implications:

  • Promotes the integration of environmental considerations into economic planning and development.

  • Encourages long-term environmental stewardship.

3. Principle of Preventive Action: Principle 6

This principle advocates for the prevention of environmental harm before it occurs, rather than addressing damage after it has happened. It underscores the importance of proactive measures to protect the environment. Implications:

  • Encourages early action to mitigate potential environmental risks.

  • Supports the development and implementation of environmental impact assessments.

4. Principle of Cooperation: Principle 24

International cooperation is essential for addressing global environmental issues. This principle calls for states to collaborate in a spirit of global partnership to protect and improve the environment. Implications:

  • Promotes the sharing of information, technology, and resources.

  • Encourages joint efforts to tackle transboundary and global environmental challenges.

5. Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR): Principle 23

While this principle was more explicitly articulated in the Rio Declaration (1992), its foundations were laid at the Stockholm Conference. It recognizes that while all states are responsible for addressing global environmental degradation, they have different capabilities and responsibilities based on their levels of development and historical contributions to environmental problems. Implications:

  • Acknowledges the varying capacities of states to address environmental issues.

  • Calls for greater support and flexibility for developing countries in meeting environmental goals.

6. Principle of Public Participation and Access to Information: Principle 19

This principle emphasizes the importance of public awareness and participation in environmental decision-making. It advocates for the dissemination of environmental information and the involvement of citizens in environmental governance. Implications:

  • Enhances transparency and accountability in environmental management.

  • Empowers communities to participate in and influence environmental policies.

7. Principle of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Principle 17

The principle of EIA requires that potential environmental impacts of proposed activities be assessed before decisions are made. This ensures that environmental considerations are integrated into the planning and decision-making processes. Implications:

  • Promotes informed decision-making.

  • Helps identify and mitigate potential environmental impacts early in the project lifecycle.

196 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page