top of page

NIEO : Principles, Challenges and Developing Countries


The New International Economic Order (NIEO) was a set of proposals put forward by developing countries in the 1970s to restructure the global economic system and address inequalities between the Global North and Global South. The major principles and demands of the NIEO were:

Major Principles

1. Sovereign Equality and Self-Determination

The NIEO emphasized the sovereign equality of all states and the right to self-determination for all peoples. This principle included the inadmissibility of acquiring territories by force and the need for territorial integrity and non-interference in the internal affairs of other states. The NIEO sought to ensure that all nations, regardless of their economic and social systems, could participate equally in solving global economic problems.

2. Control over Natural Resources

A core principle of the NIEO was the permanent sovereignty of states over their natural resources and economic activities.

This included the right of states to regulate and control the activities of transnational corporations operating within their borders and to nationalize industries if deemed necessary.

This principle aimed to empower developing countries to manage their resources in a way that would benefit their own development.

3. Fair Trade and Commodity Pricing

The NIEO called for a just and equitable relationship between the prices of raw materials exported by developing countries and the prices of manufactured goods exported by developed countries.

It advocated for the establishment of international commodity agreements to stabilize and raise the prices of primary exports from developing countries.

This was intended to address the unfavorable terms of trade that many developing countries faced.

4. Redistribution of Wealth and Economic Power

The NIEO sought the redistribution of global wealth and economic power in favor of developing nations.

This included measures such as technology transfer, increased development assistance, and debt relief.

The goal was to reduce the economic disparities between developed and developing countries and to promote sustainable development.

5. Reform of Global Economic Governance

The NIEO called for comprehensive reforms in global economic governance, including changes to the international monetary system, trade rules, and the regulation of multinational corporations.

These reforms were intended to align global economic policies with the development needs of the Global South.

Effectiveness of the New International Economic Order

The NIEO had limited success in achieving its ambitious goals. Some key outcomes and limitations include:

  1. Adoption of Resolutions: The United Nations General Assembly adopted the NIEO declaration in 1974, but it lacked binding force and faced significant opposition from developed nations.

  2. Commodity Agreements: While some commodity agreements, such as those for coffee, sugar, and tin, helped raise prices temporarily, most of these agreements eventually collapsed due to lack of compliance and changing market conditions.

  3. Debt Relief and Aid: Calls for debt relief and increased aid were only partially met. The 1980s debt crisis severely impacted many developing economies, highlighting the limitations of the NIEO's approach to addressing debt issues.

  4. Regulation of Multinational Corporations: Efforts to regulate multinational corporations through a UN code of conduct ultimately failed due to disagreements between developed and developing countries.

  5. South-South Cooperation: The NIEO facilitated greater South-South cooperation, but its core demands for restructuring global economic governance remained largely unmet.

  6. Entrenched Power Dynamics: Despite some concessions, the fundamental rules and power dynamics of the global economic order remained skewed against the interests of developing countries.

Continuing Influence

While the NIEO fell short of its transformative goals, its principles continue to influence debates around global economic justice, sustainable development, and the reform of international institutions.

The NIEO's emphasis on sovereign equality, self-determination, and fair trade remains relevant in contemporary discussions about global economic governance and the need for a more equitable international system.

The NIEO raised important issues and gave voice to the concerns of developing nations. However, it faced significant challenges and opposition that limited its effectiveness.

Despite its shortcomings, the NIEO's principles continue to shape discussions about global economic justice and the need for reforms in international economic governance.

NIEO and International Economic Institutions

The New International Economic Order (NIEO) was an ambitious initiative proposed by developing countries in the 1970s to reform the global economic system and address the structural inequalities between developed and developing nations.

Despite its noble objectives, the NIEO largely failed to achieve its goals of transforming global economic institutions such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Several factors contributed to this outcome:

  1. Political Weakness of Developing Countries: One of the primary reasons for the NIEO's failure was the political weakness of the developing countries that championed it. These countries, often referred to as the Global South, lacked the political clout and bargaining power to enforce changes in the global economic system dominated by developed countries. The developed countries, particularly those in the West, were resistant to the reforms proposed by the NIEO, as they perceived these changes as threats to their economic interests and global dominance.

  2. Economic Dependence: Many developing countries were economically dependent on the developed world for trade, investment, and aid. This dependence made it difficult for them to negotiate from a position of strength or to unite effectively to push for the NIEO's implementation. The economic leverage held by developed countries over developing ones often resulted in the latter's interests being sidelined in global economic governance.

  3. Fragmentation Among Developing Countries: While the NIEO represented a collective effort by developing countries to address global economic inequalities, there was significant fragmentation and lack of cohesion among these countries. Differences in economic priorities, levels of development, and political ideologies hindered the formation of a united front that could effectively advocate for the NIEO's goals.

  4. Global Economic and Political Context: The global economic and political context during the 1970s and 1980s, including the Cold War, the debt crisis in developing countries, and the rise of neoliberal economic policies, was not conducive to the radical reforms proposed by the NIEO. The neoliberal agenda, which emphasized market liberalization, deregulation, and privatization, was at odds with the NIEO's call for greater state intervention in the economy and redistribution of global wealth.

  5. Resistance from Global Economic Institutions: Global economic institutions such as the World Bank, IMF, and WTO were resistant to the transformative changes proposed by the NIEO. These institutions were, and to a large extent still are, dominated by developed countries, which have a major say in their policies and decision-making processes. The structural power imbalances within these institutions made it difficult for the NIEO's proposals to gain traction.

  6. Lack of Effective Implementation Mechanisms: The NIEO lacked effective mechanisms for implementation and enforcement. The resolutions and declarations associated with the NIEO were non-binding, and there were no concrete plans or strategies for how the proposed reforms would be carried out. This lack of practical implementation mechanisms contributed to the initiative's failure to bring about significant change in the global economic order.

The NIEO's failure to transform global economic institutions such as the World Bank, IMF, and WTO was due to a combination of political weakness among developing countries, economic dependence on the developed world, fragmentation among the Global South, an unfavorable global economic and political context, resistance from global economic institutions, and the lack of effective implementation mechanisms.

NIEO Principles and the WTO

The New International Economic Order (NIEO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) have had a complex relationship, with the NIEO's principles and demands often clashing with the rules and norms of the multilateral trading system established by the WTO. Here's an overview of how the NIEO intersected with the WTO. The NIEO, proposed by developing countries in the 1970s, sought to restructure the global economic system in favor of the Global South. Some of its key principles were:

  1. Permanent sovereignty over natural resources: This conflicted with the WTO's rules on non-discrimination and market access, as developing countries wanted to regulate foreign companies operating in their territories.

  2. Preferential treatment for developing countries: While the WTO allows some special and differential treatment, the NIEO demanded more comprehensive preferences and concessions for developing countries in areas like trade, technology transfer, and financing.

  3. Regulation of multinational corporations: The NIEO called for a code of conduct to regulate the activities of multinational corporations, which faced opposition from developed countries in the WTO.

  4. Reform of the international monetary system: The NIEO sought reforms in areas like global liquidity and debt relief, which were outside the WTO's mandate but impacted trade.

NIEO's Impact on the WTO

  1. Resistance from developed countries: Developed countries, which dominated the WTO's decision-making, were largely opposed to the NIEO's far-reaching demands, seeing them as a threat to their economic interests.

  2. Limited concessions: While the WTO made some concessions, like allowing preferential trade agreements among developing countries, the core demands of the NIEO were not fully met.

  3. Shift towards neoliberalism: The rise of neoliberal economic policies in the 1980s and 1990s, which emphasized market liberalization and deregulation, further sidelined the NIEO's state-centric approach.

  4. Fragmentation among developing countries: Lack of cohesion among developing countries, due to their diverse economic interests and priorities, weakened their bargaining power in pushing for NIEO principles within the WTO.

While the NIEO's ambitious goals of restructuring the global economic order were not fully realized, its principles continue to influence debates around global economic governance, development, and the need for reforms in international institutions like the WTO.

The NIEO's demands for greater equity and control over economic policies clashed with the WTO's rules and the interests of developed countries, leading to limited concessions and a gradual shift towards neoliberal policies within the multilateral trading system.

NIEO influenced other UN Resolutions

there are a few other important UN resolutions and documents related to the New International Economic Order (NIEO):

  1. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3202 (S-VI) - Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order

This resolution, adopted on the same day as the NIEO Declaration (May 1, 1974), outlined the specific program of action to implement the principles of the NIEO. It covered areas like raw materials, industrialization, transfer of technology, regulation of multinational corporations, economic cooperation among developing countries, and reform of the international monetary system.

  1. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3281 (XXIX) - Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States

Adopted in 1974, this Charter codified many of the principles and demands contained in the NIEO Declaration into a legal framework of rights and duties for states.

It covered issues like permanent sovereignty over natural resources, regulation of foreign investment, formation of commodity cartels, and preferential trade treatment for developing countries.

  1. United Nations General Assembly Resolutions on the NIEO (1975-1992)

Following the adoption of the founding NIEO resolutions in 1974, the UN General Assembly adopted several dozen additional resolutions over the next two decades reaffirming the goals of the NIEO and calling for its implementation across various domains like trade, finance, industrialization, and technology transfer.

Some key examples are resolutions 3362 (1975), 3486 (1975), 3517 (1975) on economic cooperation among developing countries.

  1. Reports of the UN Secretary-General on the NIEO

The UN Secretary-General issued periodic reports assessing progress made in establishing the NIEO and highlighting outstanding issues, such as the 1980 report (A/35/428) and the 2016 report providing an updated overview (A/71/208).

While the NIEO resolutions were non-binding, they represented an important attempt by developing countries to reshape global economic governance in a more equitable manner through multilateral negotiations and principles of international economic law in the 1970s.

99 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page